Although it is easier to use, i dislike autopan as what it does is not quite predictable, which depending on what you put it on, will cause mix issues...
If you go into automation you can automate the pan, which will yield better results...even though i find its a combination of volume, pan position, speed, and reverb that creates better depth.
Space is programmed on graph paper <!-- s;) --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_e_wink.gif" alt=";)" title="Wink" /><!-- s;) -->
Thanks for posting this! I was wondering why my template was 1.6gb!! I was getting around 500mb per instance of the autopan <!-- s:? --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_e_confused.gif" alt=":?" title="Confused" /><!-- s:? -->
Comments
If you go into automation you can automate the pan, which will yield better results...even though i find its a combination of volume, pan position, speed, and reverb that creates better depth.
Space is programmed on graph paper <!-- s;) --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_e_wink.gif" alt=";)" title="Wink" /><!-- s;) -->